Romeo+Juliet (the one with Leonardo DiCaprio) is playing in the background as I work here in the home office. Somebody tell me about Mercutio’s final moments?
He is a friend to the Montagues and, in his last act, defends Romeo’s honor. Yet his last words are, among other things, “They have made worm’s meat of me” and the more recognizable, “A plague on both your houses.”
Help me into some house, Benvolio,
Romeo and Juliet III.i.106
Or I shall faint. A plague o’ both your houses!
They have made worms’ meat of me: I have it,
And soundly too: your houses!
Yes But What Does It Actually Mean?
In case people find this post looking for an actual explanation of that line, it’s an image that Shakespeare uses frequently. You die, you go in the ground, worms eat you. Look at how Hamlet describes what’s happening to a now-dead Polonius:
Not where he eats, but where he is eaten: a certain
Hamlet IV.iii.22
convocation of politic worms are e’en at him.
Or even Sonnet 76:
No longer mourn for me when I am dead
Sonnet 76
Then you shall hear the surly sullen bell
Give warning to the world that I am fled
From this vile world, with vilest worms to dwell:
Pardon the pun, but Shakespeare and the people of the time were very …. down to earth when it came to death. Death was a sad reality; people were dying all over the place. There could be plenty of taken of heaven and angels, to be sure. But when it came to what happens to your earthly remains? Shakespeare was very frank and often pretty gross about it.
Now Back To Our Story
In this particular version, Mercutio wanders offstage alone when he utters the worm’s meat line as if it is an aside. That changes it for me. I always thought he was saying it to Romeo, referring to the Capulets. But said like that, coupled with the “both houses” line, it seems more that he’s talking about both of them. As if, in his final moments, he’s wondering, “Why did I get in the middle of that?”
I suppose it’s always been there, and he clearly says both your houses. I don’t think it ever fully sunk in for me before, though. He doesn’t blame Tybalt for killing him. He blames them both for getting him stuck in the middle. I guess my point is that the worm’s meat line is more important than the “both houses” line. Imagine for a moment that Mercutio’s not dying. He’s just angry that he’s been wounded for a dumb reason. The “both houses” line can still be hurled at Tybalt and Romeo, but it has more of a “You can both go to hell” edge to it. But the worm’s meat realization – especially said to himself, where “they” is clearly “both of them”, changes it. Mercutio knows he’s dead. The man who always has something to say is left with nothing but a curse to deliver.
Literally, both Romeo and Tybalt have gotten Mercutio, as you put it, "stuck in the middle". "Why the devil came you between us? I was hurt under your arm.", he says to Romeo. Mercurial as he is, even now (and maybe especially now) his wit is as sharp as the sword that stabbed him; he's never at a loss for a double or triple entendre. And he's quickly running out of time for many more. So I think he speaks literally, figuratively, and 'gravely' at once, noting in what he knows to be his last breathing, the real root cause of his demise–the stubborn stupidity that surrounds the feud. He refers to their "houses' three times in that one short space.
As to 'worm's meat' it could very well have originally been delivered as an aside directly to the audience as well as what follows it directly, "I have it,/And soundly too." Cement for his and our recognition of the consequences of the stupidity of everyone involved. The capper is a pause for movement (between the single abbreviated line of verse And soundly too. Your houses) as he's being helped inside a defiant summoning of energy in anger to turn and, " …Your houses! –Exit
At least that's the way I directed it. There are other ways to interpret and play it for sure.
yes but what is the literary technique/device of “they have made worms’ meat of me.”
@daphnie: You could just say that since Mercutio was one of the ‘biggest boys’ out there (due to being in a very high social ranking (Montague)) to now him being restricted down to food for one of the most irrelevant animals (Also taking to account animals where placed very low on the social hierachy, next to the common currency e.g. gold coins, silver coins etc shows the contrast between himself at the start and now the end where by his standards is pretty much irrelevant (please don’t phrase it like this in your essays).