Wednesday, August 04, 2010

Best Opening Line?

So I saw this Entertainment Weekly article about 2o Classic Opening Lines in Books.  For the curious, it stretches 20 pages for 20 lines, includes Harry Potter and does not include Orwell, Camus or Kafka.

Of course there’s no Shakespeare, since it’s always up in the air whether someone counts his work among “books”.

So I thought we’d do our own.  What were Shakespeare’s best opening lines?

I suppose Richard III’s “Now is the winter of our discontent made glorious summer by this son of York” might be the most infamous, given how frequently it is misquoted.

I like Romeo and Juliet’s “Two households, both alike in dignity, In fair Verona, where we lay our scene, From ancient grudge break to new mutiny, Where civil blood makes civil hands unclean.” Not just because it’s one of the greatest story introductions ever, but because it contains an important clue that most modern adapters seem to forget : both alike in dignity.  Everybody always wants to tell the story along racial or economic lines, putting a gigantic obstacle between the two young lovers and hitting the audience over the head with “Here’s why they can’t be together.”  I don’t think by “ancient grudge” Shakespeare meant reparations for slavery.

Who else has ideas?


Darren said...

My senior year high school English teacher spent an entire class period talking about the opening line of Hamlet. A few year's later, when Joe Papp (founder of the Public Theater in NYC) asked my first-year MFA class what the first line of Hamlet was, I was the only one to know "Who's there?"

Duane said...

I was going to bring up Hamlet, but I'm not sure I count it among the best. It does a nice job of setting up the whole "Everything's out of joint" theme of the play (not everybody realizes that the wrong guy says who's there) but I think that you need to know more about Hamlet in the first place to fully understand that.

Ebics said...

"O for a muse of fire" has to be right up there, for me - such a fittingly explosive start to the play.

But I am also partial to "In sooth, I know not why I am so sad". Doesn't set the tone for the rest of the play or anything, but I've always felt it does a brilliant job of getting you really interested really quickly.

Andrew Huntley said...

"If music be the food of love, play on."

Also, infinitely quotable.

cross said...

Dang! I was going to say "the food of love", too. Oh well. :)

I have to say, Macbeth's is great: "When shall we three meet again?" It's perfectly eerie, and gives such a sense of things unknown (they're planning to meet again, but-- what have they just finished doing?).

Monica said...

I definitely find the most joy in the Twelfth Night opening as well.

Though I saw a Grad Student production of Pericles where Gower was a sort of side show announcer telling the story of Pericles to be preformed before our eyes and while the lines weren't memorable, the introduction was.

And in Slings and Arrows, Hamlet is described as the longest knock knock joke, because of it's opening lines. Man, I love that show.

Duane said...

Watching Slings and Arrows as we speak, actually, though I'm into the Macbeth season :).

Three votes for Twelfth Night, huh? I'm intrigued. I like that line, I appreciate that it is infinitely quotable.

But ... somebody explain to me what it means?

I'm serious. People quote this all the time. Why? What does it mean? Does it mean I'm in love and I'm happy about it? Because from what I recall of the play, Orsino might be the former but he's not so much the latter. I fear this one is much like the winter of our discontent, where people have taken to quoting only half of it and no longer appreciate the context:

If music be the food of love, play on;
Give me excess of it, that, surfeiting,
The appetite may sicken, and so die.

Do all those people who are quoting it really understand that words like sicken and die are coming on in the next beats?

Cross said...

Is this your first time watching S&A? A friend and I are re-watching it, it's still excellent.

My understanding is that Orsino's saying, "I'm SO in love that I wish I weren't in love anymore." Which is a kind of a nice sentiment, as far as unrequited love goes, but the word choice is pretty morose (and reminds me of Viola's "sister").

Ed said...

"In sooth I know not why I am so
sad..." from Merchant.

On TN: Orsino's comparing music to food. Music nurishes love as food does us. However, he goes on to say that he wants "a surfeit of it" -- an overabundance of music so that, just as if he ate too much of any good thing, his appetite for it will sicken and die. He wants to get love out of his system by losing his taste for it.

Monica said...

I have always thought that the line sets the tone for the play. Here is a man who thinks he is in love, but really he suffers from an unrequited infatuation. He likes the idea of being in love and he likes the idea of languishing in love. He Produces all the right poetry about how in love he is and then immediately after this line, he gets bored with it and moves on. Allowing him to drag out his love rather than actually quenching it. For 4 lines later he says "Enough; no more: / 'Tis not so sweet now as it was before."
For me it is this characterization that I have pinned to these lines that allows me to later see him exchange one woman for the other.

JM said...

Let Fame, that all hunt after in their lives,
Live register'd upon our brazen Tombs,
And then grace us in the disgrace of death:
When spite of cormorant devouring Time,
Th'endeavour of this present breath may buy
That honor which shall bate his scythe's keen edge,
And make us heirs of all eternity.
LLL 1.1.1-7

MissWoodhouse said...

My favourite opening line has always been the Prologue to Henry the Eighth: "I come no more to make you laugh." It's just so simple, descriptive and intriguing. Why won't we laugh this time? Hmmmmm....

william sutton said...

Hi All,

I have a quiz on the first utterances in the plays at:

My favourite is probably:
In sooth I know not why I am so sad. M of V.

I love how Sh always starts smack in the middle of an ongoing conversation of a particular character.

One for the Republicans:

Noble Patricians patrons of my right...
Titus Andronicus

Sonnet 75 also does the love + food thing:
So are you to my thoughts as food to life,


Duane said...

Three votes for Twelfth Night, two for Merchant of Venice, one each for a bunch of others, by my count. Interesting!

Christopher said...

"I'm in love and I'm happy about it."

I think that would be a very boring idea to start a play with.

But of course Shakespeare turns it around. He says, "I am in love and I hate it. I want to my love to die." That is an great way to start a play!

Charlene said...

I'm in Macbeth right not, so my answer is a biased one! (Especially as this line is spoken by me ;-) )

When shall we three meet again?
In thunder, lightening, or in rain?

Duane said...

She's a witch! Burn her!

Sorry, had to be done. You don't get that kind of Shakespeare->Monty Python crossover every day, ya know.

catkins said...

I agree with Will: I love the way Shakespeare opens so many plays in the middle of a conversation. It makes great drama, but not very good "opening lines." However, there are a few that have not been mentioned, especially in the history plays:

Hung be the heavens with black, yield day to night;
Comets importing change of times and states,
Brandish your crystal tresses in the sky,
And with them scourge the bad revolting stars
That have consented unto Henry's death:

So shaken as we are, so wan with care,
Find we a time for frighted Peace to pant,
And breathe short winded accents of new broils
To be commenc'd in stronds afar remote.

Open your eares: for which of you will stop
The vent of hearing, when loud Rumor speakes?

And RIII is worth quoting in full:

Now is the winter of our discontent
Made glorious summer by this son of York;
And all the clouds that lowr'd upon our house
In the deep bosom of the ocean buried.

Duane, I like your taste: I am also fond of the opening lines of R&J.

As for Twelfth Night, Orsino is expressing lovesickness. He is in love, but SICK of it. Thus, if music is the food of love, he would like more music, to feed his love, so he can become TOO FULL, and lose his appetite, i.e., no longer be in love, and therefore, no longer suffer lovesickness. The bit about the "strain" having a "dying fall" is just a tangent from the metaphor. I agree that his loss of interest in the music is a sign of his changeability, but also, in general, of the changeability of love itself.

Duane said...

I get Orsino's lovesickness, Carl. What I'm wondering is whether all those people quoting the "music be the food of love" quote get it. Next time you see it, try responding with "You know Orsino doesn't really want to be in love when he says that, right? It's causing him pain and he's trying to make it stop." See what kind of reaction you get.

catkins said...

Oh, but of course, you are right, Duane. Shakespeare is constantly quoted out of context, often his meaning taken to be the opposite of what it is. Or, at the least, not nearly as subtle as it is.