A Will And A Way : Amazon Interviews Stephen Greenblatt

I have no idea how to determine how old this interview with Stephen Greenblatt is, but I just found it so I’m linking it. Greenblatt is the author of “Will in the World”, if you don’t recognize the name. Normally I’d put up an Amazon link for that but I’m sitting in the waiting room at my garage and just don’t really have the patience to do the necessary cutting and pasting :).

Anyway, many of the reviews of that book accused it of being something close to a love letter to Shakespeare from Greenblatt (fill in your own insinuations, there), and after reading it, I can see what they meant. It’ll be interesting to see what the man has to say.

It’s interesting right from the first paragraph.Did Shakespeare know that he was writing masterpieces? Probably not. According to Greenblatt he was just trying to keep the butts in the seats, so he had to appeal to everybody. Not the sort of answer you’d expect about Hamlet or King Lear. Titus Andronicus, maybe :). (I say that for the benefit of the oft-ignored Titus fans in my audience :)).

Another good quote, regarding “the reader who has enjoyed some Shakespeare but is not at all familiar with the mountains of scholarship and endless debates and has no theoretical background”, which is the space I’ve always tried to play in:

“First of all Shakespeare is about pleasure and interest…The idea that you actually need an advanced degree to understand Shakespeare is a joke.”

Exactly.

 

Shakespeare Audio : Gielgud reads the Sonnets?

The Internet Multicasting Service has some readings of Shakespeare available for listening, including Sir John Gielgud reading a 4 part series on the sonnets, and also excerpts from Mucho Ado and Julius Caesar. Normally I would love this, but the formats are primarily streaming, which I hate. If I can’t get it on MP3 and add it to my portable collection, it’s as if it doesn’t exist to me. But I figure others might not be quite so harsh.

Technorati Tags: shakespeare, sonnets, audio

How To Read Shakespeare

Now this is the type of article I’ve always wanted to write. “How to Read Shakespeare” breaks it down into approachable bites – sentence structure, grammar, pronoun usage, etc… and shows little tricks for trying to decipher the words into something you can better understand. I agree with the pretty much everything the author says, although he keeps pushing the SparkNotes and I’m not a big fan, there. I’m afraid that students will read the supplementary material and not read the original.

Lately I’ve been thinking about Claudius’ opening words (since I have them to music as part of “Hamlet in Space :)), and they make a good case for the examples the article discusses: “Though yet of Hamlet our dear brother’s death the memory be green….” What? Well, the article says that Shakespeare would freely rearrange the words in his sentences to suit the rhythm he needed, so you have to mentally put them back into the order you’ll better understand. Well, I spot “our dear brother Hamlet”, so we have “Though yet of our dear brother Hamlet’s death the memory be green.” Still feels backward, maybe the end needs to go at the beginning: “Though yet the memory of our dear brother Hamlet’s death be green.” It’s at this point that perhaps you pull out the annotated guide if you don’t immediately realize that to “be green” is “to be fresh and new”. So, finally, “Though yet the memory of our dear brother Hamlet’s death is still fresh in our minds…”
Another good one is “I have of late but wherefore I know not lost all my mirth” (another good musical one, this time from HAIR). “I have of late” == “Lately, I have.” I have what? Lost all my mirth. “Lately I have lost all my mirth, but wherefore I know not.” Knowing that “wherefore” means “why” from the footnotes we do that trick one more time and are left with “Lately, I’ve lost all my mirth, but I don’t know why.”
I could do that all day. 🙂

Technorati Tags: shakespeare, hamlet

Is Tybalt one of the better villains?

I always treated Tybalt as one of Shakespeare’s better villains.  He’s got nothing but hate in him, and he’s not afraid to draw his sword and go one-on-one with any challenger.  Certainly he’s a coward at heart, as they all are – he runs after he kills Mercutio, for instance.

Then again…  On the train lately I’ve been reading the script, because I’m that kind of geek.  And I notice passages like the end of Act I scene i, where Benvolio is explaining what happened to Lord Montague, and I get this:  “The fiery Tybalt, with his sword prepared, which, as he breathed defiance to my ears, he swung about his head and cut the winds, who nothing hurt withal hiss’d him in scorn…”  Does that mean that Tybalt stood there slashing at the air with his sword and not hitting anything?

Then later there is the lengthy passage where Mercutio describes Tybalt’s swordsmanship.  Is he being fair, or sarcastic?  Or both?  Is Tybalt a swordsman to be feared, or is he all talk?